Shepard writes: "Sen. Bernie Sanders leads the field of Democratic presidential candidates in Iowa, according to a new poll released Saturday."
Bernie Sanders talks to supporters during a rally at the University of Washington, in Seattle. (photo: Joshua Trujillo/Seattlepi.com)
Sanders Seizes Lead in Volatile Iowa Race, New York Times Poll Finds
25 January 20
en. Bernie Sanders leads the field of Democratic presidential candidates in Iowa, according to a new poll released Saturday.
The New York Times Upshot/Siena College survey shows one-in-four likely Democratic caucus-goers, 25 percent, pick Sanders as their first choice in next month�s caucuses.
That gives Sanders a 7-point lead over his closest competitor, former South Bend (Ind.) Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who is at 18 percent, roughly tied for second place with former Vice President Joe Biden at 17 percent and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts at 14 percent. Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota is in fifth place, at 8 percent, the only other candidate above the low single digits.
The survey, which was conducted this past Monday through Thursday and released just nine days before the caucuses, highlights the pressure on Sanders� rivals, who have seen the independent senator from Vermont surge in the weeks leading up to the first votes of the Democratic nominating process. A Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom poll released two weeks ago also showed Sanders with a single-digit advantage in the caucuses, though Biden has led in other surveys released since that.
After Iowa, Sanders also leads in polls of the first-in-the-nation primary in New Hampshire �and victories in both of the earliest voting states would make him the favorite to capture the party�s nomination.
In Iowa, the poll shows, Sanders is driven by support among young voters � along with a sizable gender gap.
Among the youngest voters � those under 30 � Sanders is the first choice of 40 percent, leading Buttigieg (16 percent), Warren (16 percent) and Biden (10 percent).
Biden, meanwhile, is the top choice of 32 percent of Democrats 65 and older, with Buttigieg (17 percent), Klobuchar (13 percent), Sanders (9 percent) and Warren (8 percent) trailing behind.
Roughly one-in-three male Democrats, 34 percent, say Sanders is their first choice � giving him a nearly 20-point lead among men over Buttigieg (15 percent), Biden (14 percent) and Warren (10 percent). The race is essentially tied among women, however, with the top four candidates all bunched between 17 percent and 20 percent.
About six-in-10 likely caucus-goers, 59 percent, say their minds are made up � including 65 percent of Sanders supporters, 65 percent of Biden backers and 64 percent of Buttigieg voters.
Because of the nature of the caucus process � two rounds of voting at each caucus site, including the elimination of low-polling candidates deemed �not viable� � polls in Iowa reflect voters� initial preferences, but not necessarily the final outcome. Still, the New York Times/Siena poll attempts to gauge voters� second choices, which may determine how they behave on Feb. 3 if their initial preference is eliminated after the first alignment.
Among Sanders� supporters, a plurality, 44 percent, would pick Warren, a fellow liberal candidate. The majority of Warren�s voters, meanwhile, are split between Sanders (37 percent) and Klobuchar (23 percent).
Caucus-goers are only allowed to choose another candidate if their first choice does not meet the viability threshold at their precinct, which is 15 percent in the vast majority of caucus sites.
The candidates polling well below Klobuchar include businessman Tom Steyer (3 percent), entrepreneur Andrew Yang (3 percent), Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii (1 percent), former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg (1 percent), Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado (0 percent), former Rep. John Delaney of Maryland (0 percent) and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (0 percent). Eight percent of caucus-goers are undecided.
For Democrats who worry that nominating Sanders � a self-avowed �democratic socialist� who is proposing a massive expansion of the federal government � will hurt the party�s chances of defeating President Donald Trump in the fall, the New York Times/Siena poll will offer little to ease their concerns.
In a general-election matchup in Iowa � a swing state Barack Obama carried twice before Trump flipped it in 2016 � Trump leads Sanders by 6 points, the poll shows, 48 percent to 42 percent. That�s a slightly larger margin than Trump has over other Democrats: He leads Buttigieg by 1 point, Biden by 2 points and both Warren and Klobuchar by 5 points.
The poll also tested Bloomberg � who is not competing in next month�s caucuses and is instead focused on states that vote later in the nominating process � against Trump, and he fares the worst. Trump leads Bloomberg, 47 percent to 39 percent.
Trump�s approval rating in the state is 51 percent, according to the poll, a little higher than his 46 percent disapproval rating.
Only 41 percent of Iowa voters would approve of the Senate removing Trump from office at the conclusion of the ongoing impeachment trial, while 53 percent would disapprove of Trump�s removal. (The poll was conducted partly before House Democrats began their three days of arguments on the Senate floor this week.)
The New York Times/Siena College poll was conducted Jan. 20-23, surveying 1,689 registered Iowa voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.8 percentage points.
For the sample of 584 likely Democratic caucus-goers, the margin of error is plus or minus 4.8 percentage points.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Who cares about this issue. Style in clothes always pushes some boundaries. It often represents some "statement" that someone wants to make. So Florida is going to outlaw some styles now but not others. The clothes police will be out in full force, cracking the heads of kids who wear their pants a little too low.
In the past, there have been attempts to outlaw short skirts on women. They said it was indecent or some nonsense. These prudes like Councilwoman Mary Rich just need to get laid. That would give her something else to think about. If she does not like seeing people's underwear, then don't look at it. Why is she staring at men's underwear anyway?
Thank god I will never have to go to Florida (or Mississippi).
No, just see her for what she is: a woman with too much power who can negatively affect the lives of young - yes, usually black - men.
Bu I can't help but smile at the image of Florida senior men who wear their pants practically up to their chins! (Remember the Martin Short character of many years ago?) No one is making their clothing choices illegal.
Right on.
Don't these people have bigger fish to fry, like more jobs at good wages in Ocala. Let their precious free market fix this.
Low pants are not a uniform for the average job except maybe in WalMart. That store is full of ass-cracks and very few teeth.
There are real threats to public safety that needs to be enforced no matter how stupid you might find somebody is dressed ! ! What is next excessive tattoos piercing shaven heads Mohawks and pink and orange hair or long hair or miss mated socks or T-shirts with holes being ticketed as well Maybe going after leather or wearing white after labor day . Everybody is going wear something somebody finds stupid.!
many levels
Besides, it's good for us older folks to keep up to date with the fashions in patterns for underwear fabrics. They're lots more lively than what us old guys wear in the way of golf and fishing shirts -- at least here in Orlando (but maybe things are different up north in Ocala).
How many of you went through a Hippy tie-dye disheveled-hair spell, the Beatles hair, suits winkle-pickers, or the Carnaby Street "Twiggy" look, Dreadlocks and bags, the ghastly "Disco-plastic" trend of the 80's, Afros, or further back, the drainpipe, Ducks-arse "Teddy-boy" trend of the early-rock late 50's and the "Angry young Beatnik" alternative of the same era.
Most were in "dubious" taste in their time but were in truth, statements of resistance to conformity, imposed tastes and mores of the post WW11 "square" powers, Cold War/McCarthy era fear-mongering and doomsday scenario which our leaders chose to visit on their populaces.
I suspect that these kids are giving the corrupt, often stupid and almost invariably self-serving makers of laws and dictators of lifestyle in the dominant, PC, bland Corporate/milit ary culture that squeezes the life out of everything creative, the vertical finger!
We don't HAVE to like it!
Best comment of the day...
excuse me a sec,,, "Hey Kid !!! get off my lawn"