RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Shepard writes: "Sen. Bernie Sanders leads the field of Democratic presidential candidates in Iowa, according to a new poll released Saturday."

Bernie Sanders talks to supporters during a rally at the University of Washington, in Seattle. (photo: Joshua Trujillo/Seattlepi.com)
Bernie Sanders talks to supporters during a rally at the University of Washington, in Seattle. (photo: Joshua Trujillo/Seattlepi.com)


Sanders Seizes Lead in Volatile Iowa Race, New York Times Poll Finds

By Steven Shepard, POLITICO

25 January 20

 

en. Bernie Sanders leads the field of Democratic presidential candidates in Iowa, according to a new poll released Saturday.

The New York Times Upshot/Siena College survey shows one-in-four likely Democratic caucus-goers, 25 percent, pick Sanders as their first choice in next month�s caucuses.

That gives Sanders a 7-point lead over his closest competitor, former South Bend (Ind.) Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who is at 18 percent, roughly tied for second place with former Vice President Joe Biden at 17 percent and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts at 14 percent. Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota is in fifth place, at 8 percent, the only other candidate above the low single digits.

The survey, which was conducted this past Monday through Thursday and released just nine days before the caucuses, highlights the pressure on Sanders� rivals, who have seen the independent senator from Vermont surge in the weeks leading up to the first votes of the Democratic nominating process. A Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom poll released two weeks ago also showed Sanders with a single-digit advantage in the caucuses, though Biden has led in other surveys released since that.

After Iowa, Sanders also leads in polls of the first-in-the-nation primary in New Hampshire �and victories in both of the earliest voting states would make him the favorite to capture the party�s nomination.

In Iowa, the poll shows, Sanders is driven by support among young voters � along with a sizable gender gap.

Among the youngest voters � those under 30 � Sanders is the first choice of 40 percent, leading Buttigieg (16 percent), Warren (16 percent) and Biden (10 percent).

Biden, meanwhile, is the top choice of 32 percent of Democrats 65 and older, with Buttigieg (17 percent), Klobuchar (13 percent), Sanders (9 percent) and Warren (8 percent) trailing behind.

Roughly one-in-three male Democrats, 34 percent, say Sanders is their first choice � giving him a nearly 20-point lead among men over Buttigieg (15 percent), Biden (14 percent) and Warren (10 percent). The race is essentially tied among women, however, with the top four candidates all bunched between 17 percent and 20 percent.

About six-in-10 likely caucus-goers, 59 percent, say their minds are made up � including 65 percent of Sanders supporters, 65 percent of Biden backers and 64 percent of Buttigieg voters.

Because of the nature of the caucus process � two rounds of voting at each caucus site, including the elimination of low-polling candidates deemed �not viable� � polls in Iowa reflect voters� initial preferences, but not necessarily the final outcome. Still, the New York Times/Siena poll attempts to gauge voters� second choices, which may determine how they behave on Feb. 3 if their initial preference is eliminated after the first alignment.

Among Sanders� supporters, a plurality, 44 percent, would pick Warren, a fellow liberal candidate. The majority of Warren�s voters, meanwhile, are split between Sanders (37 percent) and Klobuchar (23 percent).

Caucus-goers are only allowed to choose another candidate if their first choice does not meet the viability threshold at their precinct, which is 15 percent in the vast majority of caucus sites.

The candidates polling well below Klobuchar include businessman Tom Steyer (3 percent), entrepreneur Andrew Yang (3 percent), Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii (1 percent), former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg (1 percent), Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado (0 percent), former Rep. John Delaney of Maryland (0 percent) and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (0 percent). Eight percent of caucus-goers are undecided.

For Democrats who worry that nominating Sanders � a self-avowed �democratic socialist� who is proposing a massive expansion of the federal government � will hurt the party�s chances of defeating President Donald Trump in the fall, the New York Times/Siena poll will offer little to ease their concerns.

In a general-election matchup in Iowa � a swing state Barack Obama carried twice before Trump flipped it in 2016 � Trump leads Sanders by 6 points, the poll shows, 48 percent to 42 percent. That�s a slightly larger margin than Trump has over other Democrats: He leads Buttigieg by 1 point, Biden by 2 points and both Warren and Klobuchar by 5 points.

The poll also tested Bloomberg � who is not competing in next month�s caucuses and is instead focused on states that vote later in the nominating process � against Trump, and he fares the worst. Trump leads Bloomberg, 47 percent to 39 percent.

Trump�s approval rating in the state is 51 percent, according to the poll, a little higher than his 46 percent disapproval rating.

Only 41 percent of Iowa voters would approve of the Senate removing Trump from office at the conclusion of the ongoing impeachment trial, while 53 percent would disapprove of Trump�s removal. (The poll was conducted partly before House Democrats began their three days of arguments on the Senate floor this week.)

The New York Times/Siena College poll was conducted Jan. 20-23, surveying 1,689 registered Iowa voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.8 percentage points.

For the sample of 584 likely Democratic caucus-goers, the margin of error is plus or minus 4.8 percentage points.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+7 # RMDC 2014-07-23 19:23
What else would anyone expect from Florida. I wish they would pass a law banning Jeb Bush from showing his ugly face in public. I'd much prefer to see someone underwear than Bush's mug.

Who cares about this issue. Style in clothes always pushes some boundaries. It often represents some "statement" that someone wants to make. So Florida is going to outlaw some styles now but not others. The clothes police will be out in full force, cracking the heads of kids who wear their pants a little too low.

In the past, there have been attempts to outlaw short skirts on women. They said it was indecent or some nonsense. These prudes like Councilwoman Mary Rich just need to get laid. That would give her something else to think about. If she does not like seeing people's underwear, then don't look at it. Why is she staring at men's underwear anyway?

Thank god I will never have to go to Florida (or Mississippi).
 
 
+8 # SundownLF 2014-07-23 23:40
Somehow, Councilwoman Rich's 'getting laid' is NOT the answer here! Getting laid is no cure for bigotry and stupidity. (And it's so often men who wouldn't know how to provide a 'decent lay' who are the quickest to suggest it...)

No, just see her for what she is: a woman with too much power who can negatively affect the lives of young - yes, usually black - men.

Bu I can't help but smile at the image of Florida senior men who wear their pants practically up to their chins! (Remember the Martin Short character of many years ago?) No one is making their clothing choices illegal.
 
 
+3 # Henry 2014-07-24 07:57
I'm really tired of looking at guys' underwear frankly. It's a ******* stoopid fad. I'm also sick of watching them fondle themselves constantly, in the real world (?) and on television. Adolescents though most of them are, hellow can you just do whatever in private? It's embarrassing and degrading to yourselves and everyone else who can't avoid watching you. Jeez. And finally, it's "aggressive" idn't it? Actively aggressive and flaunting. Jerks.
 
 
0 # Henry 2014-07-24 08:00
Quoting SundownLF:
Somehow, Councilwoman Rich's 'getting laid' is NOT the answer here! Getting laid is no cure for bigotry and stupidity. (And it's so often men who wouldn't know how to provide a 'decent lay' who are the quickest to suggest it...)


Right on.
 
 
0 # RMDC 2014-07-24 14:52
Sorry about that comment. I just could not resist saying something idiotic in response to this idiocy. I wonder what Councilwoman Mary Rich wore when she was a teenager. Old people are constantly complaining about the way teens wear their clothes and they completely forget that they did something similar when they were teens. I wonder if there are any photos of Mary Rich as a teen on the net? Do you think she's of the age to have followed the Madonna fashion of wearing only a bra and no shirt?
 
 
+13 # Activista 2014-07-23 19:38
Half of big belly fat Americans are wearing their their trousers two inches below their 50" waist ...
 
 
+13 # RMDC 2014-07-23 21:18
That's right. And when they bend down to pick up another six pack, you can see the crack of their fat asses. Now Councilwoman Mary Rich will want to ban ass cracks.
 
 
+1 # MJnevetS 2014-07-24 11:29
Nope, those are white ass cracks
 
 
+4 # jwb110 2014-07-24 00:07
It was only a matter of time before the GOP/TP would set a dress code for America.

Don't these people have bigger fish to fry, like more jobs at good wages in Ocala. Let their precious free market fix this.
Low pants are not a uniform for the average job except maybe in WalMart. That store is full of ass-cracks and very few teeth.
 
 
+2 # ericlipps 2014-07-24 04:42
 
 
+4 # hd70642 2014-07-24 05:05
While to me the baggy pants look is a defeatist celebration of ignorance since it originated in prison . This came about since The prison industrial complex has created a populace all too familiar with incarceration for the most,meager / pettiest violations in same vein the military industrial complex has lead to a populace all too familiar with war !

There are real threats to public safety that needs to be enforced no matter how stupid you might find somebody is dressed ! ! What is next excessive tattoos piercing shaven heads Mohawks and pink and orange hair or long hair or miss mated socks or T-shirts with holes being ticketed as well Maybe going after leather or wearing white after labor day . Everybody is going wear something somebody finds stupid.!
 
 
+3 # NAVYVET 2014-07-24 07:45
Ocala's inland, not on the ocean or gulf, but there are plenty of lakes for swimming and sunbathing. Go someplace else, gals in bikinis!
 
 
+2 # Kootenay Coyote 2014-07-24 07:57
 
 
+1 # Buddha 2014-07-24 08:02
"Land of the Free". We need to update our marketing brochures me thinks.
 
 
0 # born1929 2014-07-24 09:17
ya gotta hand it to Florida .... a most advanced state at so
many levels
 
 
+2 # lyman 2014-07-24 09:38
I always thought it was a prudent public safety measure to let rambunctious adolescents voluntarily hobble themselves in their running ability.

Besides, it's good for us older folks to keep up to date with the fashions in patterns for underwear fabrics. They're lots more lively than what us old guys wear in the way of golf and fishing shirts -- at least here in Orlando (but maybe things are different up north in Ocala).
 
 
+3 # reiverpacific 2014-07-24 10:37
Well, I'm tired of immaculately-su ited and coiffed thugs running the country into the ground, similarly-attir ed Owner-Media anchors, pundits and especially members of the neocon club gang who should be in Super-max or Abu Grahib for crimes against humanity, abusing, polluting and dominating OUR airwaves. Also suited and robed Theocrats disguised as SCOTUS injustices and judges in the lower courts, military uniform-attired war-hawks being practically worshipped and imitated by marching bands across the country while they wreak havoc around the globe.
How many of you went through a Hippy tie-dye disheveled-hair spell, the Beatles hair, suits winkle-pickers, or the Carnaby Street "Twiggy" look, Dreadlocks and bags, the ghastly "Disco-plastic" trend of the 80's, Afros, or further back, the drainpipe, Ducks-arse "Teddy-boy" trend of the early-rock late 50's and the "Angry young Beatnik" alternative of the same era.
Most were in "dubious" taste in their time but were in truth, statements of resistance to conformity, imposed tastes and mores of the post WW11 "square" powers, Cold War/McCarthy era fear-mongering and doomsday scenario which our leaders chose to visit on their populaces.
I suspect that these kids are giving the corrupt, often stupid and almost invariably self-serving makers of laws and dictators of lifestyle in the dominant, PC, bland Corporate/milit ary culture that squeezes the life out of everything creative, the vertical finger!
We don't HAVE to like it!
 
 
0 # Joe Bob 2014-08-02 11:56
Reiver you nailed it....
Best comment of the day...
excuse me a sec,,, "Hey Kid !!! get off my lawn"
 
 
0 # MJnevetS 2014-07-24 11:52
 
 
-1 # skylinefirepest 2014-07-24 14:49
Geez, would you listen to the liberals complain to the point of stupidity. Do you really want to see anybody's underwear?? DO YOU REALLY??? I didn't think so.
 
 
+1 # phrixus 2014-07-25 07:48
Disregarding all other relevant issues, I think the baggy, saggy, falling-down pants fashion is so lame that it's beyond laughable. Guys that do this simply look retarded. It's even worse than the absurd Goth craze that blew through. Idiots that do this apparently either don't own a mirror or never read the user manual that came with it. Grow up, guys. Save that crap for Halloween. There's enough visual pollution in the world without you adding to it.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN